^ a b Jason Clenfield (March 17, 2011).^ Regulatory Guide for Reviewing Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Reactor Facilities Archived at the Wayback Machine Nuclear Safety Commission, published, accessed.^ Important dates in the history of The Denki Shimbun Archived at the Wayback Machine The Denki Shimbun, accessed.
^ a b c Japan Nuclear Energy Drive Compromised by Conflicts of Interest Bloomberg, published, accessed.^ a b c Convention on Nuclear Safety National Report of Japan for Fourth Review Meeting Government of Japan, published September 2007, accessed.^ a b c (in Japanese) Work Archived at the Wayback Machine Japan Electric Association, accessed.^ a b (in Japanese) Profile Archived at the Wayback Machine Japan Electric Association, accessed.Professor Katsuhiko Ishibashi, one of the seismologists on a Japanese government subcommittee that produced the 2006 Regulatory Guide for Reviewing Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Reactor Facilities claimed that the review process was 'unscientific' and the outcome rigged to suit the interests of the JEA, which had 11 of its committee members on the 19-member government subcommittee and that among other problems the guide was 'seriously flawed' as a consequence because it underestimated the design basis earthquake ground motion. There have been allegations that the JEA wields too much power in setting standards. Through the work of its committees, the JCA prepares and publishes a number of codes and guides for the Japanese nuclear power industry, including the Rules of Quality Assurance for Safety of Nuclear Power Plants (JEAC 4111-2003) and the Guideline for Development and Design of Computerized Human-Machine Interface in the Central Control Room (JEAG 4617-2005), intended to meet the performance requirements specified under the Electricity Utilities Industry Law As of 2007, the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency were engaged in the process of evaluating certain standards produced by the JEA and others for technical adequacy.
0 kommentar(er)
